Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2006-016303

Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2006-016303: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Tuscany Courts Condominium Association.

Case Number
CV2006-016303
County
Maricopa
Caption
Not captured
Filed
10/26/2006
Case Type
Civil
Judge
Blaney, Scott
Location
Downtown
Official Court Record
Official Court Record

Parties

Party Relationship Attorney
Mark A Burks Defendant Pro Per
S F N Group Inc Garnishee Defendant Pro Per
Tuscany Courts Condominium Association Plaintiff Chad Hester
Unifund C C R Defendant Pro Per

Minute Entries

02/14/2008 — CV2006016303 BURKS, MARK A 02/14/2008 COMMISSIONER MICHAEL L. BARTH View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/21/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-016303
02/14/2008
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
COMMISSIONER MICHAEL L. BARTH
R. Aguilera
Deputy
TUSCANY COURTS CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ANDREW ELLIS
v.
MARK A BURKS, et al.
UNIFUND C C R
C/O BURSEY & ASSOC PC STA AGT
3561 E SUNRISE DR #225
TUCSON AZ 85718
CRAIG L ARMSTRONG
CIVIL DEFAULT HEARING
Courtroom OCH-005. Proceedings are digitally audio-recorded in lieu of a court
reporter.
1:48 p.m. This is the time set for civil default hearing. Plaintiff Tuscany Courts
Condominium is represented by Counsel Craig Armstrong. Defendant Mark A. Burks is not
present or represented by counsel.
Craig Armstrong is sworn and testifies.
IT IS ORDERED granting judgment in favor of Plaintiff Tuscany Courts Condominium
and against Defendant Mark A. Burks, all in accordance with the formal written Default

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-016303
02/14/2008
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2
Judgment modified and signed by the Court on February 14, 2008 and filed (entered) by the
clerk on February 14, 2008.
1:55 p.m. Matter concludes.
LATER:
Upon further consideration of Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and review of the
itemization of tasks, time spent, and amount billed, this Court has determined that the amount of
attorneys’ fees requested is reasonable.
In view of the foregoing, Plaintiff shall submit an amended form of Judgment to include
the original amount of attorney’s fees requested within 5 days hereof.
DIVISION STAFF REVIEW:
February 22, 2008

Documents

Type Title Content Type Size Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2006016303 BURKS, MARK A 02/14/2008 COMMISSIONER MICHAEL L. BARTH View Minute Entry application/pdf 8.0 KB Document Source

Auto-compiled from public records, pending verification

Review the official court record for the current docket.

To request a correction or removal, contact the site administrator.