01/07/2014 — CV2013004384 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN RIDGE 01/07/2014 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/08/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
01/07/2014
Docket Code 025
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
S. Uppendahl
Deputy
LYNN S GARCIA
MACK T JONES
v.
SOUTHERN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
CHRISTOPHER D STICKLAND
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court received Plaintiff’s Motion to Set and Certificate of Readiness, filed
December 23, 2013. The Court will take no action on Plaintiff’s Motion to Set as the parties
already have a Joint Scheduling Order in place and a Telephonic Status Conference scheduled on
September 26, 2014 at 9:45 a.m.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
04/28/2015 — CV2013004384 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN RIDGE 04/28/2015 HONORABLE PATRICIA ANN STARR View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/29/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
04/28/2015
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE PATRICIA ANN STARR
S. Brown
Deputy
LYNN S GARCIA
MACK T JONES
v.
SOUTHERN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
LOUIS T SELETOS
JESSICA J KOKAL
DISMISSAL CALENDAR
The Court is advised this case has been settled.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal on June 29,
2015 without further notice unless prior to said date Judgment is entered or filed or a Stipulation
for Dismissal is presented.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating any previous order placing/continuing this matter
on the inactive/dismissal calendar.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED any pending motions are hereby deemed moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the trial setting conference set on April 28, 2015
in this division.
07/03/2014 — CV2013004384 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN RIDGE 07/03/2014 HONORABLE PATRICIA ANN STARR View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/07/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
07/03/2014
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE PATRICIA ANN STARR
S. Brown
Deputy
LYNN S GARCIA
MACK T JONES
v.
SOUTHERN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
CHRISTOPHER D STICKLAND
JESSICA J KOKAL
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED approving/granting the Second Stipulation to Extend Discovery
Deadlines electronically filed on July 1, 2014, all in accordance with the formal written Second
Amended Scheduling Order signed by the Court on July 2, 2014 and entered (filed) by the clerk
on July 3, 2014.
Pursuant to the Second Amended Scheduling Order,
IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic Trial Setting Conference on March 9, 2015 at
8:30 a.m. (15 minutes). The parties are expected to be prepared with their calendars as well as
the calendars of any primary witnesses so the Court can set a firm trial date for this matter.
Counsel for Plaintiff is requested to arrange and initiate the conference call to the Court at 602-
506-4164.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public Access Terminals
at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
12/03/2013 — CV2013004384 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN RIDGE 12/03/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/05/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
S. Uppendahl
Deputy
LYNN S GARCIA
MACK T JONES
v.
SOUTHERN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
CHRISTOPHER D STICKLAND
ORDER TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Comprehensive Pretrial Conference,
electronically filed on November 1, 2013. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
Counsel and/or the parties are to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in
Rule 16(b), Ariz. R. Civ. P. Counsel and/or the parties shall prepare and file with the Court, no
later than 5:00 p.m. on January 2, 2014, a Joint Scheduling Order, for discovery, motion and
disclosure deadlines.
If the parties agree to the dates, they should prepare an Order in the form attached
hereto, containing the provisions which are applicable to their case. For example, paragraph one
of the Order set forth below need not be included in the parties’ proposed Order if the parties
intend to disclose their experts’ identity and opinions at the same time they disclose their
experts’ areas of testimony. Similarly, if the parties agree to simultaneously disclose the identity
and opinions of their expert witnesses, they need not include in their proposed Order the
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
language set forth in paragraph 2a. and b., below.
The proposed Order shall include specific dates (June 1, 2013, rather than 45 days from
close of discovery). Do not incorporate a firm trial date in the proposed Order.
If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items that are to be included in the
Order, the reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in a separate document and
not in the proposed Order.
The Court will review the proposed Scheduling Order. If all is in order, the Court will set
a status conference close to the discovery cutoff date. At the status conference, if the parties
have completed discovery and are ready for trial, the Court will set firm dates for the final pretrial
management conference and the trial. If the parties are not ready for trial, the matter will be
placed on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal within 60 days.
If counsel feel a pretrial conference is still necessary at this stage of the litigation, they
should address the reasons why in the first paragraph of the proposed Scheduling Order.
If a Joint Scheduling Order is not timely submitted, the Court will place the matter back
on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal.
NOTE: COUNSEL SHALL UPLOAD AND E-FILE ALL PROPOSED ORDERS
IN WORD FORMAT ONLY TO ALLOW FOR POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS BY THE
COURT.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-filed
documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders 2010-117
and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance with this
requirement after May 1, 2011.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Scheduling Order and adopts and/or modifies
the days as follows:
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose areas of expert testimony by
1.
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. [or]
Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
a.
2013.
Defendants shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
b.
2013.
The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
2.
their expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. [or]
Plaintiffs shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
a.
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
Defendants shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
b.
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
Any and all discovery requests shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
3.
The parties shall disclose all non-expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
4.
2013. [or]
Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
a.
2013.
Defendants shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on
b.
________, 2013.
The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose their rebuttal expert
5.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4
witnesses and opinions by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
All discovery shall be concluded by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
6.
The parties shall have exchanged up-to-date final Rule 26.1 Supplemental
7.
Disclosure Statements by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. This Order does not replace
the parties’ obligation to seasonably disclose on an on-going basis under Rule 26.1 as
information becomes available.
The parties shall file dispositive motions no later than _______, 2013;
8.
Settlement conference (choose one):
9.
The parties shall participate in private mediation by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013;
OR
The parties shall participate in a mandatory Settlement Conference. This case is
referred to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge
pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the parties will
receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and
any "pro per" parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date,
time, and location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested
to conduct a settlement conference not later than (at least 90 days out), 2013. The
Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement
conference so please do not contact that office. If counsel prefer to use a private
mediator to conduct the Settlement Conference, a Stipulation and Order re:
Alternative to ADR must be presented to the Court by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and
complete authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in
good faith in the Settlement Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to
participate.
No expert witnesses, expert opinions, lay witnesses, or exhibits shall be used at trial
10.
other than those disclosed in a timely manner, except for good cause shown or written
agreement of the parties.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 5
All pretrial motions, other than motions in limine, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on
11.
________, 2013. This includes requests for Rule 702/Daubert hearings.
For trial or any evidentiary hearing, exhibits shall be submitted to the clerk a
12.
minimum of five days prior to the scheduled trial or evidentiary hearing.
A Telephonic Status Conference is set for ______, 2013, at ____a.m./p.m. in this
13.
division for the purpose of determining whether the case is ready for trial and, if
appropriate, to set trial. Counsel shall have their trial calendars available. Counsel for
Plaintiff shall initiate the telephonic conference by first arranging the presence of all
other counsel on the conference call and by calling this division at: (602) 372-0825
promptly at the scheduled time.
NOTE: This Court utilizes FTR for an electronic record of the proceedings.
However, any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division
three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.
14. Should any discovery disputes arise, counsel, prior to filing discovery motions, shall
meet and confer pursuant to Rule 37, Ariz.R.Civ.P.
The dates set forth in this Order are FIRM dates and will not be extended or modified
15.
by this Court absent good cause. Lack of preparation will not ordinarily be
considered good cause.
This case is removed from the Inactive Calendar and all requirements of Rule 38.1,
16.
Ariz.R.Civ.P., are waived unless and until otherwise ordered by the Court.
Dated:
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-004384
12/03/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 6
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
